Energy, Efficiency, and Worth The Intel Core i7-13700K Delivers It All. Up to date: Dec 3, 2024 4:18 pm WePC is reader-supported. Whenever you purchase by hyperlinks on our web site, we might earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to alter. Study extra Desk of Contents Desk of Contents The Core i7-13700K is one in all Intel’s middle-ground processors and sits in an ungainly market (although it was as soon as thought of the perfect CPU for worth). Many agree that the 14th era wasn’t price the additional cash over the thirteenth era as a result of not an excessive amount of modified (apart from the added E-cores within the 14700K), furthering the viability of the thirteenth era after the refresh – particularly if you wish to avoid wasting cash. We predict the 13700K is commonly neglected as a result of it sits beside two widespread chips (the 13600K and the 13900K), the previous for effectivity and cost-effectiveness and the latter for uncooked efficiency. The thirteenth era additionally took place when Intel began dominating single and multi-threaded duties, making the 13700K a stranger possibility as a result of if you happen to needed uncooked efficiency, you simply opted for the 13900K. So, how does the 13700K evaluate to at present’s CPUs, particularly the brand new Core Extremely 200 collection? Specs Cores: 16 Threads: 24 Base velocity: P-cores 3.4 GHz / E-cores 2.5 GHz Increase velocity: P-cores 5.4 GHz / E-cores 4.2 GHz Cache: 24MB TDP: 125 W / 253 W enhance. What We Assume The Intel Core i7-13700K affords distinctive efficiency at a lovely worth level. It delivers clean gaming experiences, environment friendly multitasking, and robust total processing energy, making it a strong selection for each avid gamers and creators alike. Its steadiness of worth and efficiency makes it a standout in its class, particularly for customers who need reliability with out overspending. Nevertheless, it has been outmoded by the Core Extremely 265K if you happen to care in regards to the very newest effectivity performs. Causes to Purchase Sturdy single-core and multi-core efficiency Glorious worth for cash Nice for gaming and productiveness duties Causes to Keep away from Very excessive energy consumption in comparison with later fashions Lacks a number of the cutting-edge options of newer chips Efficiency might be overkill for informal customers Specs and comparability Right here, we evaluate the specs of the 13700K to these of the 14900K to see what has modified generationally. We are able to additionally briefly study the 265K, the (XX700K alternative). Part Core i7-13700KCore i7-14700KCore Extremely 265KCores162020Core Config8P+8E8P+12E8P+12EThreads 242820Base frequencyP-core 3.4 GHz / E-core 2.5 GHzP-core 3.4 GHz / E-core 2.5 GHzP-core 3.9 GHz / E-core 3.3 GHzBoost frequency P-core 5.4 GHz / E-core 4.2 GHzP-core 5.6 GHz / E-core 4.3 GHzP-core 5.5 GHz / E-core 4.6 GHzBoost 3.05.4 GHz5.6 GHzN/AMemory speed5600 MT/s5600 MT/s6400 MT/sPCI Specific lanes20 (Gen 5)16 (Gen 5)20 (Gen 5)L2 cache 80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)L3 cache30 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)TDP / PL1 / PL2125W / 253W / 253W125W / 253W / 253W125W / 250W / 250WProcess size10 nm10 nm3 nmSocketLGA 1700 (appropriate with H610, B660, H670, Q670, Z690, W680, B760, H770, Z790)LGA 1700 (appropriate with H610, B660, H670, Q670, Z690, W680, B760, H770, Z790)LGA 1851 (appropriate with Z890)13700K vs 14700K vs 265K specs Efficiency Earlier than moving into the nitty-gritty, we have to define the parts in our take a look at bench. We do that to advertise transparency and to point out you that your outcomes will differ from ours if you happen to use completely different {hardware}. Understanding how the CPU performs in ours can be a good way to gauge how effectively it might carry out in your system. Earlier Subsequent Part WePC take a look at rigCPUCore i7-13700KCoolerCorsair H150i Elite LCDMotherboardASUS Z790 Darkish Hero MemoryCorsair Dominator Platinum DDR5 @6800 MHzGPUMSI RTX 4070 Ti PSUASUS Thor Platinum II 1000WCaseCooler Grasp Masterframe WePC take a look at bench parts As we are able to see, we spare no expense when testing CPUs to make sure we extract probably the most efficiency attainable. We additionally like to check parts, even when testing throughout completely different manufacturers and generations. This produces comparable outcomes and helps us provide you with data that truly helps. Gaming Efficiency MetricCS2Days GoneCP 2077Doom EternalHorizon FWScore (FPS)AVG: 31899%: 173.33AVG: 245.0799%: 154.54AVG: 221.9899%: 164.81AVG: 447.3099%: 329.95AVG: 184.3299%: 134.07AVG temp (package deal) °C5454635863Max temp (package deal) °C6967706570Average PPT (W)99.22W98.88W134.74W119.84W118.95WWePC Core i7 13700K gaming benchmarks The Intel Core i7-13700K is a succesful gaming processor that delivers spectacular outcomes throughout numerous titles. Counter-Strike 2’s common body fee of 318 FPS ensures distinctive fluidity, whereas the 99th percentile rating of 173.33 FPS highlights constant efficiency even in demanding moments. This degree of responsiveness is valuable for aggressive avid gamers. For open-world titles like Days Gone, the CPU hits a mean of 245.07 FPS. This outcome displays clean gameplay with minimal stutter, even in areas with many environmental particulars. Equally, Cyberpunk 2077, recognized for its heavy reliance on CPU and GPU, sees the 13700K delivering a mean of 221.98 FPS with a steady 99th percentile of 164.81 FPS. That is glorious for such a demanding sport, making it ideally suited for high-refresh-rate gaming even in graphically intensive situations. Thermals stay well-controlled all through testing, with common package deal temperatures hovering between 54°C and 63°C, relying on the sport. Even below heavier hundreds, the utmost temperatures peak at a fairly manageable 70°C (though you will want a 360mm AIO cooler for these outcomes). Energy draw varies by workload, staying environment friendly at round 99W for lighter video games like CS2 however reaching 134W in titles like Cyberpunk 2077. These figures are per expectations for a high-performance chip just like the 13700K. Comparability CPUCS2Days GoneDoom EternalHorizon FWCore i7-13700KAVG: 31899%: 173.33AVG: 245.0799%: 15.54AVG: 447.3099%: 329.95AVG: 184.3299%: 134.07Core Extremely 7 265KAVG: 309.799%: 130.9AVG: 212.899%: 137.9AVG: 495.799%: 347.8AVG: 192.299%: 139.3WePC 13700K vs 265K gaming efficiency The Core i7-13700K faces powerful competitors from its successor regardless of the drawbacks of the Core Extremely 7 265K, a part of Intel’s newest Arrow Lake lineup, which it does effectively. In Counter-Strike 2, the 13700K holds its floor with a better common FPS (318 vs. 309.7) and a considerably higher 99th percentile rating (173.33 vs. 130.9). For aggressive avid gamers, the 13700K nonetheless delivers smoother efficiency on this fast-paced shooter. In Days Gone, the 13700K once more takes the lead with a mean FPS of 245.07, comfortably outpacing the 265K’s 212.8. Its higher 99th percentile rating of 154.54 in comparison with 137.9 reveals its potential to take care of steadier efficiency throughout intense gameplay, making it higher fitted to open-world adventures. Nevertheless, Doom Everlasting tells a special story, with the 265K pushing forward due to a mean FPS of 495.7 in comparison with the 13700K’s 447.3. Its stronger 99th percentile rating (347.8 vs. 329.95) means that the Arrow Lake structure brings noticeable enhancements in video games optimized for multi-core processing. Regardless of the Core Extremely 7 265K positive factors, the 13700K stays a robust performer, notably in older or less-optimized titles the place its effectivity and stability shine. Whereas Arrow Lake represents the longer term, the 13700K nonetheless affords glorious worth and reliability for avid gamers at present. Artificial benchmarks MetricCPU ZCinebench R23GeekbenchBlender renderScore (factors)Single 865Multi 12,486Single 2079Multi 30,120Single 2,943Multi 19,559Monster: 179.91 SPMJunkshop: 129.43 SPMClassroom: 89.04 SPMAVG temp (package deal) °C65Single: 54Multi: 814581Max temp (package deal) °C83Single: 62Multi: 937395Average PPT (W)108.29WSingle: 52.3W Multi: 192.18W46.84W186.67WWePC 13700K artificial benchmarks The Intel Core i7-13700K delivers respectable leads to artificial benchmarks, showcasing its versatility throughout each single-core and multi-core workloads. In CPU-Z, it achieves 865 factors in single-core and 12,486 in multi-core, highlighting its steadiness of uncooked velocity and parallel processing functionality. Cinebench R23 additional reinforces this, with 2,079 single-core factors and a powerful 30,120 in multi-core, demonstrating its potential to deal with demanding inventive workloads like rendering or heavy multitasking. Geekbench follows an identical development, with 2,943 in single-core and 19,559 in multi-core. This positions the 13700K as a strong performer for blended workloads, from gaming to productiveness. In Blender, its scene render instances break right down to 179.91 SPM (Monster), 129.43 SPM (Junkshop), and 89.04 SPM (Classroom), solidifying its power in 3D rendering duties. Thermals and energy utilization are per expectations for a high-performance chip. Common package deal temperatures vary from 54°C in lighter single-core situations to 81°C below multi-core stress. Energy draw peaks at 192W throughout multi-threaded Cinebench duties, showcasing its potential to push efficiency boundaries whereas sustaining cheap effectivity. Once more, you’ll want a 360mm AIO for these temps. These outcomes replicate a processor that excels throughout various artificial benchmarks, making the 13700K a wonderful selection for avid gamers and creators who demand constant efficiency however don’t wish to spend an arm and a leg on a chip. CPUScoreAVG temp (package deal) °CMax temp (package deal) °CAverage PPT (W)Core i7-13700KSingle 2079Multi 30,120Single: 54Multi: 81Single: 62Multi: 93Single: 52.3WMulti: 192.18WCore Extremely 7 265KSingle 2,037Multi 33,429Single: 48Multi: 63Single: 54Multi: 69Single: 55.52WMulti: 162.63WRyzen 7 7700X (PCGuide)Single 1,995Multi 19,650N/AN/AN/ACinebench R23 scores 13700K vs 265K The Core i7-13700K continues to point out robust efficiency, notably in single-threaded duties, the place its rating of two,079 edges out each the Core Extremely 7 265K (2,037) and Ryzen 7 7700X (1,995). This makes it a wonderful selection for duties that depend on clock velocity and responsiveness. Nevertheless, the Core Extremely 7 265K leads with 33,429 factors in multi-threaded workloads, outperforming the 13700K’s 30,120. The Ryzen 7 7700X falls considerably behind in multi-core efficiency at 19,650, reflecting its decrease core rely. Thermals and energy effectivity spotlight some key variations. The 13700K runs hotter and attracts extra energy throughout multi-core workloads (81°C and 192W) in comparison with the 265K’s cooler 63°C and 162W. The 7700X lacks thermal and energy information, however its multi-core efficiency suggests it’s much less aggressive than both Intel chip. Total, the 13700K balances excessive single-core efficiency and aggressive multi-core outcomes. Nevertheless, the Core Extremely 7 265K affords higher effectivity and multi-threaded efficiency, reflecting the developments in Arrow Lake structure. The Ryzen 7 7700X holds its personal in single-threaded duties however trails in multi-threaded workloads, making it much less versatile for heavy computational calls for. Value When evaluating costs, the Intel Core i7-13700K affords the perfect worth at $273.47, delivering strong gaming and multi-core efficiency with out breaking the financial institution. It’s ideally suited if you happen to’re on the lookout for strong efficiency with out spending an excessive amount of. The Core Extremely 7 265K, priced at $388.95, is a costlier possibility that provides higher multi-core efficiency and cutting-edge know-how, making it a good selection if you happen to want the most recent structure for productiveness duties. Nevertheless, we wouldn’t advocate this chip for gaming alone. The Ryzen 7 9700X sits at $320.00 and affords an excellent gaming and productiveness efficiency steadiness, making it a strong middle-ground selection. The Ryzen 7 7700X at $264.95 is the closest competitor to the 13700K worth, excelling in gaming however trailing in multi-core efficiency. Lastly, the Core i7-14700K at $347.00 is a robust performer that sits between the 13700K and Core Extremely 265K, providing strong efficiency for extra demanding duties with out reaching the worth of the 265K. It’s as much as you to resolve which processor most accurately fits your wants. Remaining Phrase
