Intel’s latest VS AMD’s greatest Up to date: Oct 24, 2024 3:18 pm WePC is reader-supported. Once you purchase via hyperlinks on our website, we might earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to alter. Study extra Desk of Contents Desk of Contents Intel has simply launched the Core Extremely 9 285K, the most recent flagship CPU on the Arrow Lake structure. Earlier than its launch, we noticed glimpses of the record-breaking efficiency it may supply, however does it nonetheless maintain up in opposition to arguably the world’s hottest gaming CPU, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D? Quite a lot of adjustments have been made to Intel’s newest era desktop CPU vary, some extra questionable than others – like ditching hyperthreading (a characteristic that’s been a staple of Intel CPUs for over 22 years). Whereas Intel’s choice to drop hyperthreading may increase some eyebrows, they’ve clearly doubled down on productiveness efficiency. As we famous in our evaluation, the Core Extremely 9 285K shines in heavy workloads, although it doesn’t fairly hit the mark we hoped for in gaming – which is the place the 7800X3D shines. Intel has made an enormous effectivity play with the fifteenth era CPUs, and sadly, that appears to be to the detriment of gaming efficiency. The model even got here out saying its flagship could be roughly 5% down VS the 7800X3D – making this battle an attention-grabbing one to say the least. So, does it nonetheless have sufficient in it to beat the 7800X3D – let’s discover out. Intel Core Extremely 9 285K Professionals Very environment friendly throughout all workloads Cheaper than AMD flagship A lot better multi-core efficiency than 9950X Cons Underwhelming gaming efficiency Appears like one thing is lacking Too targeted on effectivity AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Professionals As much as 7% quicker than 13900K Insane gaming efficiency for the cash Cons One CCD restricted by V-cache At a look Core Extremely 9 285K vs. Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Intel’s newest flagship drops hyperthreading for productiveness positive aspects, whereas AMD’s 7800X3D stays a high gaming alternative with its 96 MB L3 cache. Efficiency: The 285K’s 24-core design excels in multi-core workloads however falls quick in gaming in comparison with the 7800X3D’s larger body charges. Platform Variations: Intel gives quicker reminiscence (6400 MT/s) with its Z890 chipset, whereas AMD’s AM5 socket supplies broader compatibility for simpler upgrades. Energy Effectivity: AMD’s CPU is extra power-efficient in gaming, making it ultimate for decrease temperatures and regular body charges. Future Outlook: Players might need to watch for the 9800X3D’s launch, which may outshine each CPUs, whereas the 285K stays robust for productiveness wants. Aspect by facet specs: 285K Vs 7800X3D It’s necessary to investigate the paper specs of every CPU, so we all know what we’re evaluating. Doing this might help us perceive why one part (not simply CPUs) benchmarks higher in sure workloads. Element Core Extremely 285KRyzen 7 7800X3DCores248Threads 2416Hybrid architectureP-core: 8E-core: 16N/ABase frequencyP-core: 3.7 GHzE-core: 3.2 GHz4.2 GHzBoost frequency P-core: 5.5 GHzE-core: 4.6 GHzUp to five GHzMemory speed6400 MT/s5200 MT/sPCI Categorical lanes20 (Gen 5)24 (Gen 5)L2 cache 3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)L3 cache36 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)TDP / PL1 / PL2 / PL2 (excessive)125W / 250W / 250W / 295W120W / 162W / 162W / 162WProcess size3 nm5 nmSocketLGA 1815 (appropriate with Z980)LGA 1718 (appropriate with X870, B850, X670, B650, A620)Core Ultea 285K vs 7800X3D specs The Core Extremely 9 285K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are essentially very completely different of their designs, focusing on completely different areas of efficiency. The 285K brings a hybrid structure to the desk, with a mix of 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores. This setup is all about dealing with a mixture of workloads, balancing single-threaded efficiency with effectivity in multi-core duties. With a excessive increase frequency of 5.5 GHz on its P-cores and assist for blazing-fast 6400 MT/s reminiscence, the 285K is tailor-made for customers who want a flexible powerhouse able to dealing with productivity-heavy functions with out breaking a sweat. Alternatively, AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on a special form of effectivity: precision in gaming and balanced efficiency. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the 7800X3D may appear modest in comparison with Intel’s 24 cores, however its secret weapon lies within the huge 96 MB L3 cache. This makes it a standout for avid gamers – particularly in titles that thrive on fast entry to massive knowledge units. And whereas it doesn’t attain the identical clock speeds as Intel’s chip, its 5 nm course of and decrease energy draw make it an interesting alternative for individuals who prioritize cooler and quieter techniques with out sacrificing gaming efficiency. CPU benchmark efficiency Earlier than we begin, it’s crucial to notice that each one the testing was carried out on the BIOS that shipped with the motherboard, and on preliminary chipset drivers. Although we aren’t anticipating an enormous change, efficiency might differ on launch software program, so bear that in thoughts. Benchmark rig specs When performing benchmarks, we wish to hold issues as constant as attainable, even throughout generations and types. The place we regularly must adapt the benchmark rig to accommodate completely different tech, we use parts that mirror the specs of one another as carefully as attainable, as per our how we check CPUs web page. In the event you create favorable circumstances for one piece of {hardware}, the outcomes are not comparable. With that stated, right here’s what comprised our rig via each benchmark classes. Element NameCPUIntel: Intel Core Extremely 285K / AMD: Ryzen 7 7800X3DCoolerCorsair H150i Elite LCDMotherboardIntel: ASUS Maximus Hero Z890 / AMD: ASUS Crosshair X870 Hero MemoryCorsair Dominator Platinum DDR5 @6800 MHzGPUMSI RTX 4070 Ti PSUASUS Thor Platinum II 1000WCaseCooler Grasp Masterframe WePC check bench parts Gaming and artificial efficiency 285K vs 7800X3D gaming 285K vs 7800X3D gaming energy effectivity 285K vs 7800X3D multi core artificial 285K vs 7800X3D single core benchmarks Earlier Subsequent The Intel Core Extremely 9 285K and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D take completely different paths to high-performance computing, every with its personal strengths. The Core Extremely 9 285K shines in multi-core workloads because of its 24-core hybrid design (8 P-cores, 16 E-cores). This setup permits it to dominate in productiveness duties, delivering scores like 42,399 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18,866 in CPU-Z Multi – far forward of the 7800X3D’s 17,646 and seven,248, respectively. It’s the best choose in case you’re juggling duties like video modifying or 3D rendering, providing extra cores and threads to energy via demanding functions. 285K vs 7800X3D gaming In distinction, AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on gaming efficiency, leveraging its X3D cache to edge out Intel’s flagship in lots of titles. Video games like Doom Everlasting see the 7800X3D hitting 526.4 FPS in comparison with the 285K’s 499.8 FPS, and even in Horizon Forbidden West, AMD’s CPU leads with 219.8 FPS over Intel’s 202.6 FPS. These positive aspects, mixed with a typically extra environment friendly energy draw throughout gaming – 68.4W versus the 285K’s 108.04W in Doom Everlasting – make the 7800X3D an interesting alternative for pure gaming builds. In the event you’re trying to drive the utmost variety of frames out of your PC, then the 7800X3D is the way in which to go. Finally, the selection comes right down to what you worth extra. The Core Extremely 9 285K gives unmatched multi-core power, making it a go-to for heavy productiveness alongside respectable gaming efficiency. In the meantime, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D focuses on gaming effectivity, delivering smoother gameplay and higher energy consumption in high-refresh-rate eventualities. Each CPUs have their enchantment, however their strengths make them suited to completely different wants, relying on whether or not you’re extra targeted on gaming or productiveness. Are there any platform variations? This can be a extra advanced query to reply, because the 7800X3D belongs to AM5, which implies it’s appropriate with a variety of motherboards and chipsets that each one supply completely different options. Naturally, regressing right down to earlier chipsets will yield much less superior and feature-rich choices, so, we’re going to stay with the most recent generations. Selecting the most recent era of {hardware} means you’re getting the same characteristic set, no matter which facet you go together with. This time, there’s actually no vital drawback between the 2. Consider the X870 and Z890 chipsets as simply completely different platforms to your CPU. Both method, you’re getting a strong base. Each chipsets supply assist for PCIe Gen 5 throughout GPUs and storage, USB 4, and WiFi 7 (a minimum of on higher-end fashions – extra budget-friendly boards may fluctuate). It’s value noting that Z890 motherboards typically assist larger reminiscence speeds in comparison with X870, as seen with fashions just like the ASUS Strix Z890 A. ASUS Strix X870 DDR5 pace ASUS Strix Z890 DDR5 pace Supply: ASUS retailer web page Do you have to watch for the 9800X3D? The discharge of the 9800X3D is looming, and if the 7000 collection is something to go off, it’s going to be one heck of a gaming efficiency powerhouse. If the 7800X3D can beat the 9950X then that tells us that the 9800X3D should not have any concern doing the identical. If you’d like the best possible gaming efficiency then it may be higher to go for the newer X3D CPUs. The 9800X3D additionally nonetheless belongs to AM5, so you’ll be able to set up it onto any AM5 motherboard, you aren’t compelled to shell out a load of cash for a motherboard improve, as you’re on Intel. That stated, it is best to solely take into account the 9800X3D if you wish to construct a pure gaming rig – if you wish to go the productiveness route and do some streaming or video modifying even somewhat bit, it may be extra prudent to select up a CPU higher at multitasking. Closing Phrase: which CPU is healthier? The battle between the Intel Core Extremely 9 285K Vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D reveals distinct strengths catering to completely different person wants. The Core Extremely 285K excels in productiveness with its strong hybrid structure, boasting 24 cores that dominate multi-core duties. Nevertheless, its gaming efficiency doesn’t fairly match that of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which leverages its spectacular 96 MB L3 cache for superior gaming effectivity. Whereas the 285K’s larger clock speeds and reminiscence bandwidth assist productivity-heavy functions, the 7800X3D constantly delivers smoother gameplay with higher energy effectivity, making it the preferable alternative for gaming lovers. As the discharge of the 9800X3D approaches, potential consumers ought to weigh up their priorities fastidiously. If pure gaming efficiency is the purpose, the upcoming 9800X3D may outshine each contenders. Nevertheless, for customers balancing productiveness and gaming, the selection leans towards the Core Extremely 285K for multitasking capabilities.
